E-ISSN: 1308-5263
Turkish Hematologists’ Preferences for Relative Donor Selection: Results of a Multicenter Survey [Turk J Hematol]
Turk J Hematol. Ahead of Print: TJH-58260 | DOI: 10.4274/tjh.galenos.2024.2024.0099  

Turkish Hematologists’ Preferences for Relative Donor Selection: Results of a Multicenter Survey

Sıdıka Gülkan Özkan1, Ali Kimiaei2, Ali Hakan Kaya3, Mehmet Sezgin Pepeler4, Hasan Atilla Özkan1, Mutlu Arat5
1Bahçeşehir University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Hematology, İstanbul, Türkiye;Medical Park Göztepe Hospital, Adult Hematology and Bone Marrow Transplantation Unit, İstanbul, Türkiye
2Bahçeşehir University Faculty of Medicine, İstanbul, Türkiye
3Maltepe University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Hematology, İstanbul, Türkiye; Medical Park Pendik Hospital, Clinic of Adult Hematology and BMT, İstanbul, Türkiye
4Ankara Bilkent City Hospital, Clinic of Hematology, Ankara, Türkiye
5İstanbul Florence Nightingale Hospital Group, Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation Unit, İstanbul, Türkiye

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) is a widely utilized treatment for various hematological diseases. While selection criteria for unrelated donors are wellestablished, there is a lack of consistency and standardization in the selection of related donors. To investigate the current approach of hematologists to the selection of relative donors at Turkish hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) centers. The study employed a cross-sectional survey design, distributing a self-administered questionnaire to 95 adult and pediatric transplantation centers in Turkey to investigate their approach to related donor selection for allo- HSCT. The questionnaire collected data on various aspects including the center's experience in performing allo-HSCT, patient groups treated, number of allo-HSCT procedures conducted between 2015 and 2021, preferences for related donors, considerations in related donor selection (such as gender and past pregnancies), guidelines utilized for related donor selection, upper age limit for related donors, and the use of specialized advanced analyses for elderly donors. The response rate to the survey was 38.9%. Variability was observed across centers in gender consideration and the impact of past pregnancies on related female donor rejection. Different guidelines were employed for related donor selection, with the European Bone Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) guidelines being the most commonly used. Regarding the upper age limit for related donors, 8.1% of centers accepted an upper age limit of 55, 48.7% preferred an upper age limit of 65, and 43.2% even selected related donors aged 65 and above. The lack of standardized guidelines for related donor selection in HSCT centers leads to variability in criteria and potential risks. Collaboration among centers is essential to establish consensus and develop standardized protocols.

Keywords: Donor selection, Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, HSCT, Standardized protocols, Survey




Corresponding Author: Sıdıka Gülkan Özkan


TOOLS
Full Text PDF
Print
Download citation
RIS
EndNote
BibTex
Medlars
Procite
Reference Manager
Share with email
Share


Similar articles
PubMed
Google Scholar