Follicular lymphoma (FL) is the most common subtype of indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma in Western countries. While FL is generally incurable, standard initial therapies are associated with high response rates and durable remissions for most patients. In addition, novel targeted agents and immunotherapies are changing the treatment algorithm for patients with relapsed or refractory disease. This review discusses the initial staging, prognosis, and treatment options for newly diagnosed and relapsed/refractory FL. Initial treatment options for FL include active surveillance, radiotherapy, rituximab monotherapy, and chemoimmunotherapy. Staging with positron emission tomography/ computed tomography and bone marrow biopsy is crucial for identifying early-stage patients. Most patients with FL will receive chemoimmunotherapy as the initial treatment with options including rituximab or obinutuzumab plus cyclophosphamide, vincristine, and prednisone; cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone; bendamustine; or lenalidomide. No significant differences in overall survival have been observed in randomized studies comparing these regimens. Maintenance therapy with rituximab or obinutuzumab in responders to initial chemoimmunotherapy improves progression-free survival. For relapsed/refractory FL, treatment options include chemoimmunotherapy, lenalidomidebased regimens, tazemetostat, chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cell therapy (axicabtagene ciloleucel and tisagenlecleucel), and CD3/ CD20 bispecific antibodies (BsAbs). Given the encouraging outcomes obtained with CAR-T cell therapy and BsAbs, multiple trials are testing these highly active agents in earlier lines of therapy and among highrisk patients with early relapse after frontline chemoimmunotherapy. Additional studies and follow-up are needed to understand how these novel agents may further change treatment algorithms for FL.

Objective: Calprotectin (CLP), S100A6, and high mobility group nucleosome-binding protein 1 (HMGN1), known as alarmins, are involved in the pathogenesis of many tumors. In this study, we aimed to investigate the relationships of serum CLP, S100A6, and HMGN1 levels with the clinical and laboratory findings of patients with multiple myeloma (MM) and their roles in the pathogenesis of MM.
Materials and Methods: We measured the serum CLP, S100A6, and HMGN1 levels of 55 newly diagnosed patients and 32 healthy controls using the sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay method. The medical records of the patients were also reviewed.
Results: Serum CLP, S100A6, and HMGN1 levels were significantly decreased in MM patients compared to the control group (p=0.012, p=0.001, and p=0.030, respectively). Receiver operating characteristic analysis was used to determine diagnostic cut-off values for serum CLP, S100A6, and HMGN1 of <98 ng/mL (area under the curve [AUC]: 0.663, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.554-0.761, p=0.009), <1174.5 pg/mL (AUC: 0.706, 95% CI: 0.598-0.799, p=0.001), and <440.18 pg/mL (AUC: 0.640, 95% CI: 0.530-0.740, p=0.03), respectively. CLP levels were found to be statistically significantly higher in patients with light chain MM (91.58±22.57 ng/mL) compared to heavy chain MM (79.42±15.83 ng/mL) (p=0.03). A negative correlation was observed between CLP and M protein, immunoglobulin G, globulin, and beta-2 microglobulin (correlation coefficients: -0.361, -0.370, -0.279, -0.300, respectively; p=0.024, p=0.06, p=0.04, p=0.0033).
Conclusion: In this study, we found that serum CLP, S100A6, and HMGN1 levels were statistically lower in patients with newly diagnosed MM compared to the control group. These results suggest that CLP may bind to the paraprotein produced by heavy chain MM in the blood, causing its blood levels to be low. Additionally, low levels of HMGN1, which is involved in DNA repair, suggest that HMGN1 may contribute to the complex genetic abnormalities found in cases of MM.

Objective: Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibition in cardiac tissue causes inhibition of the PI3K-AKT signaling pathway, which is responsible for protecting cardiac tissue during stress. Therefore, there is an increase in the risk of arrhythmia. This study explores the prediction of that risk with the Age-Creatinine-Ejection Fraction (ACEF) score as a simple scoring system based on the components of age, creatinine, and ejection fraction.
Materials and Methods: Patients diagnosed with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) and receiving ibrutinib treatment for at least 1 year were evaluated with echocardiography and Holter electrocardiography and the results were compared with a control group of CLL patients who had not received treatment. ACEF score was calculated with the formula age/left ventricular ejection fraction+1 (if creatinine >2.0 mg/dL).
Results: When the arrhythmia development of the patients was evaluated, no statistically significant difference was found between the control and ibrutinib groups in terms of types of arrhythmias other than paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF). PAF was found to occur at rates of 8% versus 22% (p=0.042) among ibrutinib non-users versus users. For patients using ibrutinib, an ACEF score of >1.21 predicted the development of PAF with 77% sensitivity and 75% specificity (area under the curve: 0.830, 95% confidence interval: 0.698-0.962, p<0.001).
Conclusion: The ACEF score can be used as a risk score that predicts the development of PAF in patients diagnosed with CLL who are scheduled to start ibrutinib.

Objective: Primary immune thrombocytopenia (pITP) is an acquired autoimmune disorder related to the increased destruction and/or impaired production of platelets. Its diagnosis and management are challenging and require expertise and the interpretation of international consensus reports and guidelines with national variations in availability. We aimed to assess the agreement of hematologists in Türkiye on certain aspects of both first-line and second-line management of patients with pITP.
Materials and Methods: Applying a modified Delphi method, the Turkish National ITP Working Group (14 steering committee members), founded under the auspices of the Turkish Society of Hematology, developed a 21-item questionnaire consisting of statements regarding the first-line and second-line treatment of pITP. A total of 107 adult hematologists working in either university or state hospitals voted for their agreement or disagreement with the statements in two consecutive rounds.
Results: The participants reached consensus on the use of corticosteroids as first-line treatment and with limited duration. Methylprednisolone was the corticosteroid of choice rather than dexamethasone. Use of intravenous immunoglobulin was not preferred for patients without bleeding. It was also agreed that thrombopoietin receptor antagonists (TPO-RAs) or rituximab should be recommended as second-line treatment and that splenectomy could be considered 12-24 months after diagnosis in patients with chronic pITP.
Conclusion: The optimization of the dose and duration of TPO-RAs in addition to corticosteroids is necessary to improve the management of patients with pITP.

Objective: We aimed to investigate antiplatelet drug resistance utilizing light transmission-lumiaggregometry (LT-LA) and the Platelet Function Analyzer-100 (PFA-100) in patients undergoing cardiovascular surgery.
Materials and Methods: The study included 60 patients diagnosed with stable coronary artery disease and peripheral vascular diseases that required surgery. Participants were divided into three groups: patients receiving aspirin (ASA) (n=21), patients receiving clopidogrel (CLO) (n=19), and patients receiving dual therapy (ASA+CLO) (n=20). Aggregation and secretion tests by LT-LA and closure time by the PFA- 100 were used to measure antiplatelet drug resistance.
Results: Based on the adenosine diphosphate (ADP)-induced aggregation test, 43% of patients were resistant to ASA, 22% to CLO, and 15% to dual therapy. Diabetes, hypertension, and hyperlipidemia were the most commonly identified comorbid disorders. In patients with comorbid risk factors, the median value of platelet aggregation response to ADP was significantly higher in the ASA group than in the CLO and dual therapy groups (p=0.0001). In patients receiving ASA monotherapy, the maximum amplitude of aggregation response to platelet agonists was ≥70% in 43% of patients for ADP and 28% for collagen by LT-LA. Elevated ADP (≥0.29 nmol) and collagen (≥0.41 nmol)-induced adenosine triphosphate release were found by LT-LA in 66% of patients utilizing an ADP agonist and 80% of patients using a collagen agonist undergoing ASA therapy. Closure times obtained with the PFA-100 were normal in 28% of patients using collagen- ADP cartridges and 62% of patients using collagen-epinephrine (CEPI) cartridges who received ASA. Recurrent thrombosis and bleeding were observed in 12 (20%) patients with cardiovascular disease. Three of these individuals (25%) showed ASA resistance with normal responses to ADP-induced aggregation (≥70%) and secretion (≥0.29 nmol), as well as normal CEPI closure times.
Conclusion: Our findings suggest that antiplatelet drug monitoring with LT-LA and PFA-100 may be useful in high-risk and complicated cardiovascular patients.